We all know the story The Emperor’s New Clothes: the vain and gullible king tricked into wearing invisible non-existent clothes and parading thru town in his birthday suit. Only a child, too young to understand the rules, blurts out, “But he hasn’t got anything on.”
Most of us were taught this is a story about a foolish king.
It isn’t.
In Hans Christian Andersen’s fable, the cloth is said to be invisible to anyone who is unfit for office or unusually stupid. That is the genius of the con. The trap isn’t designed just for the emperor. It’s designed for everyone around him.
After the child’s observation has spread and the whole town cries out, “But he hasn’t got anything on,” the story ends thus:
“The Emperor shivered, for he suspected they were right. But he thought, ‘This procession has got to go on.’ So he walked more proudly than ever, as his noblemen held high the train that wasn’t there at all.”
THE SCENE: The Cabinet Room, February 2025
TIME: 11:00 AM.
SETTING: The mahogany table is polished to a mirror shine. The “Noblemen” sit in high-backed chairs, eyes fixed on the man at the center. The air is thick with the scent of “invisible” silk.
THE EMPEROR (Nodding, Thinking): “The progress is incredible... Nobody has ever seen anything like it.”
SCOTT TURNER (HUD Secretary) (Leaning in, eyes closed): “Thank you, God, for President Trump. Thank you for the blessing of being in your presence... for anointing us to do this job.”
PAM BONDI (Attorney General) (Beaming): “Mr. President, your first 100 days has far exceeded that of any other presidency in this country ever. I’ve never seen anything like it.”
ELON MUSK (DOGE) (With a tech-mogul’s certainty): “This could be the greatest administration since the founding of the country… the best Cabinet ever. And I don’t give false praise.”
The EMPEROR stands. He feels a sudden chill - perhaps a draft from a window, or the faint, high-pitched frequency of a child’s voice rising from the press corps. For a split second, the “invisible silk” feels like exactly what it is: nothing. He pauses, looking at his bare arms. He suspects the child is right. But then he looks at the adoring, terrified faces of his court.
THE EMPEROR (To himself) The procession must go on.
He marches toward the door. Behind him, the Noblemen scramble, their hands clutching at the empty air, carefully lifting the heavy, non-existent train so it doesn’t trip the Great Man.
The tragedy of the modern court isn’t that they are blind; it’s that they have perfect vision but have traded their voices for a seat near the invisible silk.
The most dangerous thing about invisible thread is that the supply is infinite. You can stitch any fiction into a robe of state, and as long as the court performs the labor of carrying it, the Emperor is never forced to feel the sting of his own nakedness.
Why Do They Hold the Train?
It isn’t because they are blind. It’s because the “invisible” fabric has become their only currency. To let go of the train is to admit they have spent their careers - and their reputations - clutching at thin air.
In Andersen’s tale, the nobles feared looking foolish. In modern politics, they fear exile. They have traded their vision for a seat at the table, and the price of that seat is a constant, exhausting performance. They must lift the train higher and higher, not because it’s heavy, but because the higher they lift it, the harder it is for the townspeople to see that their hands are empty.
A naked emperor is an embarrassment. A naked emperor commanding the military, the courts, and the economy is a crisis.
The question isn’t whether the Emperor believes in his own finery. The question is why the Quislings continue the charade. The answer is the most human one of all: Once you’ve helped sew the lie, the truth becomes your executioner.
So they march on, their knuckles white, gripping the empty air. Because letting go doesn’t just expose the King. It exposes the Court.



Thank you for the compliments on this one. If it makes sense for you, please forward the email containing it to at least one person. Our focus on the enablers is a little different from straight-on criticisms of the "emperor" and may resonate with others. Maybe even have some effect...
I agree with Steve S. Outstanding! The Quislings posts just keep getting better - deeper insights, more accessible imagery, thoughtful analysis. Well done!